fishcustardfanzine.co.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the fishcustardfanzine.co.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host fishcustardfanzine.co.uk. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is Google Inc. .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called GSE containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

pages home issues shop about the fanzine/contribute charity page twitter facebook youtube subscribe to issues by rss thursday, 12 january 2017 issue 18 contribution details - doctor who fan writers wanted! celebrating 6-and-a-half years as perhaps the whoniverse’s most silliest fanzine, fish fingers and custard is back for 2017 and we’re seeking doctor who fan writers to help us create our latest issue! with doctor who back in the spring (finally!) and a christmas episode and a spin-off series to digest, not to mention this being steven moffat’s last series as head writer , we’re very much looking forward to getting stuck into presenting our own thoughts/hopes/fears for the episodes to come. are you? contribute to issue 18! what’ve you been doing in the downtime since doctor who has been off the air? watching old episodes? maybe you’ve discovered the classic series or the many spin-off books and audios? been to any conventions/events? maybe you’ve been watching something else entirely – let us know what you’ve been up too! for issue 18, we’re seeking reviews/views on the following; the return of doctor mysterio – super? or not? class – the bbc three spin-off series – what did you think? doctor who series 10 – what you’re looking forward to, what not you’re looking forward to steven moffat – will you miss him when he’s gone? will you throw a party? anything else? we accept anything as long as it’s vaguely related to doctor who! please see any of our previous issues for more information. we don’t have a specific word count for any pieces we receive – we feel that writing is always at its best when the writer writes as much as they feel like . then again, there may be issues if you send in a 40,000-word essay on, for example, ‘ why superheroes shouldn’t be in doctor who ’! generally, we get articles of around 500-1,500 words – if you feel like you can do more, get in touch and we will be able to arrange something. it isn’t just written essays that we’re after – we are also on the lookout for any art , poems , spoofs ...basically anything that can read! again, send us an e-mail with your ideas. if you’ve contributed before, or are completely new to this thing we call fanzining then we’d love to hear from you! want to join our band of doctor who fan writers? get in touch! please send your contributions or any enquiries to [email protected] and we’ll get back to you. the deadline for contributions for issue 18 is after sunday 26 th february – with the hope that the issue will be out on the virtual streets by the start of doctor who series 10! (series 10! where has the time gone?) cheers all, hope you doctor who fan writers are having a great start to the new year! posted by danielgeeisgreat at 21:03 1 comment: links to this post email this blogthis! share to twitter share to facebook share to pinterest labels: 12th doctor , bbc , doctor who , dr who , fanzine , matt lucas , peter capaldi , sci-fi , uk , writers wanted saturday, 23 april 2016 build-a-companion (taken from issue 17) with the new doctor who companion set to revealed today (23rd april) here is an article from our latest issue, looking at what sort of companion the show may go for... (you can download our latest issue for free here ) --- a s we know by now jenna coleman has made her exit from doctor who, so we’re on the lookout for a new companion for the upcoming series. so who is next? which sort of companion (or companions) should the doctor travel around with? should he even have a companion? well yes, otherwise this entire article would be utterly pointless. so unlike those build-a-bear shops you see littered around the large, uninspiring, zombie-filled shopping centres in major cities around the world - let’s build an uplifting and inspiring companion! male? there’s been a rumbling underground campaign amongst forum-dwellers for a while about this issue. i suppose that rory has arguably been the only (regular) male companion since the series came back in 2005. even then, he seemed to play second fiddle to amy and was only really brought on board after amy tried to jump the doctor at the end of flesh and stone . would a male companion work? i’m not sure how i feel about this; if you look through the history of the show, it has generally balanced having the (male) doctor with having at the very least, one female companion. unless they were to introduce a female doctor to compliment our man, it would be ‘unbalanced’ if balancing genders is indeed important to us viewers (imagine the criticism a male-only doctor who, or even, a female-only doctor who would receive) if we do indeed have to have a ‘balanced’ doctor who with at least one member of each sex, then why not introduce a secondary companion? somebody who isn’t related to the current companion, someone who they just happen to pick up? someone who would ironically unbalance the genders, despite what i said earlier? rigsy would have been ideal, i personally would have loved to learn more about him, but he has a family now and is seemingly settled down and him abandoning all of that would just seem tactless on his part. alien or non-contemporary? i don’t know about you, but i’m constantly growing tired of re-visiting the modern-day with our modern-day companion. russell t davies once tackled this issue by making a comment of something along the lines of ‘ we need a modern-day companion for the viewers to be able to relate to them ’. that’s a fair point – but is it something that needs to happen every single time a new companion is cast? i feel that if you treat viewers like they won’t understand a character, if you don’t think they won’t relate to them, then you run the risk of growing complacent by constantly treading the same old ground – which will only seep into the story. using an alien, who is very unfamiliar with earth customs, has been done before – but barely in the modern-day series. i’m thinking of a leela, but not a direct copy of leela. i’m not sure they’ll be able to get away with the skimpy outfits. similarly, a non-contemporary companion would offer a balance between being familiar with earth, but unfamiliar with other elements, which can only make stories set in the modern-day, that more interesting to viewers and perhaps help us to learn things about our modern life that we tend to neglect. not happy to be there? yeah, we had a turlough who wasn’t necessarily happy to be around and more recently, donna who appeared on board just as she was about to get married, before returning of her own volition. what would be interesting, is having our character who is simply not happy to be aboard the tardis – not necessarily trying to sabotage the doctor, but someone who is desperate to get home but is constantly messed about with. why are they desperate to get home? who (if not the doctor) is messing about with them? like a big finish lucie miller, but not exactly a big finish lucie miller. you can already see how story branches can grow from this narrative tree. celebrity? one aspect of the rtd era i didn’t like was the drafting in of these ‘in the moment celebrities who play themselves’ just to gain an extra few thousand viewers – will kids in 50 years time know (or care) who mcfly are? no, in all likelihood they won’t, but i’m all for the casting of a long-deceased celebrity in doctor who. it would be interesting to see a character with an established history experience something that didn’t happen in reality and it can only bring out the creative best in writers, as they try to interweave established fact around their stories. it will only work with a deceased celebrity, as aside from the murky rights issues, the fact that we know who these long-dead people are today, just shows that people will always remember them in the future, which obviously isn’t the case with modern-day or relatively-recent-living celebrities. within doctor who, we’ve had celebrity historicals that perhaps take a liberty or two with est

URL analysis for fishcustardfanzine.co.uk

http://www.fishcustardfanzine.co.uk/search/label/uk
http://www.fishcustardfanzine.co.uk/2011/
http://www.fishcustardfanzine.co.uk/2012/03/
http://www.fishcustardfanzine.co.uk/search/label/jenna%20coleman
http://www.fishcustardfanzine.co.uk/2011/07/
http://www.fishcustardfanzine.co.uk/2015/11/
http://www.fishcustardfanzine.co.uk/2013/10/
http://www.fishcustardfanzine.co.uk/2017/01/issue-18-contribution-details-doctor.html
http://www.fishcustardfanzine.co.uk/2010/11/
http://www.fishcustardfanzine.co.uk/search/label/fanzine
http://www.fishcustardfanzine.co.uk/2013/05/
http://www.fishcustardfanzine.co.uk/2012/
http://www.fishcustardfanzine.co.uk/2014/11/
http://www.fishcustardfanzine.co.uk/search?updated-max=2015-09-10t22:15:00%2b01:00&max-results=7
http://www.fishcustardfanzine.co.uk/2016/03/issue-17-out-now.html#links
fanwnak.blogspot.co.uk
playthingofsutekh.blogspot.co.uk
bbc.co.uk
vworpvworp.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Error for "fishcustardfanzine.co.uk".

the WHOIS query quota for 2600:3c03:0000:0000:f03c:91ff:feae:779d has been exceeded
and will be replenished in 198 seconds

WHOIS lookup made at 12:39:09 01-Oct-2017

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER co.uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS fishcustardfanzine.co.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED no

DOMAIN

  NAME fishcustardfanzine.co.uk

NSERVER

  NS.123-REG.CO.UK 212.67.202.2

  NS2.123-REG.CO.UK 62.138.132.21

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .